allk12 · Rankings · Lowest poverty · Oklahoma · Middle schools

The lowest-poverty (most affluent) public middle schools in Oklahoma · page 6

Ranks 251–300 of the lowest-poverty (most affluent) public schools in Oklahoma. Back to page 1.

LOWEST POVERTY · OKLAHOMA

#	School	City	District	Level	Students	% FRL
251	COMMERCE MS	COMMERCE, OK	COMMERCE	Middle	173	83.2%
252	MCLISH MS	Stonewall, OK	STONEWALL	Middle	130	83.8%
253	APACHE MS	Apache, OK	BOONE-APACHE	Middle	112	83.9%
254	ANADARKO MS	Anadarko, OK	ANADARKO	Middle	256	84.0%
255	WEWOKA MS	Wewoka, OK	WEWOKA	Middle	157	84.1%
256	THOMAS IES	Holdenville, OK	HOLDENVILLE	Middle	310	84.2%
257	MARIETTA MS	Marietta, OK	MARIETTA	Middle	241	84.2%
258	WARD ES EAST	Colbert, OK	COLBERT	Middle	165	84.2%
259	NORTH PARK ES	Guymon, OK	GUYMON	Middle	424	84.4%
260	WATONGA MS	Watonga, OK	WATONGA	Middle	148	84.5%
261	JAMES L. CAPPS MS	Warr Acres, OK	PUTNAM CITY	Middle	938	84.5%
262	Nathan Hale Middle School	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	Middle	782	84.7%
263	SHAWNEE MS	Shawnee, OK	SHAWNEE	Middle	693	84.7%
264	HASKELL MS	Haskell, OK	HASKELL	Middle	179	84.9%
265	6TH AND 7TH GRADE ACADEMY	Muskogee, OK	MUSKOGEE	Middle	551	85.5%
266	JAY UPPER ES	Jay, OK	JAY	Middle	321	85.7%
267	CARNEGIE MS	Carnegie, OK	CARNEGIE	Middle	112	85.7%
268	HOMINY MS	Hominy, OK	HOMINY	Middle	127	85.8%
269	WESTERN OAKS MS	Bethany, OK	PUTNAM CITY	Middle	677	86.0%
270	TRAICE MS	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	Middle	122	86.1%
271	MEMORIAL MS	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	Middle	572	87.4%
272	DOVE SCIENCE ACADEMY MS-SOUTH OKC	OKlahoma City, OK	DOVE SCHOOLS OF OKC (CHARTER)	Middle	310	87.7%
273	COOPER MS	Oklahoma City, OK	PUTNAM CITY	Middle	501	88.0%
274	IDABEL MS	Idabel, OK	IDABEL	Middle	242	89.3%
275	STILWELL MS	Stilwell, OK	STILWELL	Middle	291	89.3%
276	EMERSON MS	Enid, OK	ENID	Middle	353	89.5%
277	KANSAS MS	Kansas, OK	KANSAS	Middle	175	90.3%
278	HUGO MS	Hugo, OK	HUGO	Middle	216	90.7%
279	ARDMORE MS	Ardmore, OK	ARDMORE	Middle	312	91.3%
280	MONROE DEMONSTRATION MS	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	Middle	657	91.5%
281	East Central Middle School	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	Middle	843	91.7%
282	WILL ROGERS COLLEGE MS	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	Middle	646	91.8%
283	KIPP TULSA MS COLLEGE PREP	Tulsa, OK	KIPP TULSA ACADEMY CHARTER	Middle	274	92.0%
284	DANIEL WEBSTER MS	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	Middle	350	92.0%
285	TULSA HONOR ES	Tulsa, OK	TULSA HONOR CHARTER ACADEMY	Middle	366	92.1%
286	DUNBAR INTERMEDIATE ES	Okmulgee, OK	OKMULGEE	Middle	268	92.5%
287	CENTRAL MS	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	Middle	296	92.9%
288	TULSA HONOR FLORES MS	Tulsa, OK	TULSA HONOR CHARTER ACADEMY	Middle	349	93.4%
289	SOUTHEAST MS	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	Middle	596	94.0%
290	JOHN MARSHALL MS	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	Middle	698	94.6%
291	LONGFELLOW MS	Enid, OK	ENID	Middle	519	95.0%
292	STAR SPENCER MS	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	Middle	114	95.6%
293	SANTA FE SOUTH WEST MS	Oklahoma City, OK	SANTA FE SOUTH CHARTER	Middle	321	95.6%
294	ASTEC CHARTER MS	Oklahoma City, OK	ASTEC CHARTER SCHOOL	Middle	413	95.6%
295	SANTA FE SOUTH MS	Oklahoma City, OK	SANTA FE SOUTH CHARTER	Middle	738	95.7%
296	MAYFIELD MS	Oklahoma City, OK	PUTNAM CITY	Middle	838	96.9%
297	MOON MS	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	Middle	588	96.9%
298	WESTERN HEIGHTS MS	Oklahoma City, OK	WESTERN HEIGHTS	Middle	370	97.3%
299	Rogers Middle School	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	Middle	518	97.5%
300	TAFT MS	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	Middle	1,096	97.8%

Page 6 of 7 · top 308 of 308 ranked. NCES + state assessment data, 2024-25.↓ Download full CSV

All Oklahoma schools →

Lowest poverty rankings at a wider scope

Nationwide

Other rankings for Oklahoma

Largest Most diverse Lowest ratio Highest proficiency Fastest growing Highest poverty Highest ratio Fastest declining Lowest proficiency Most Hispanic Most Black Most White Most Asian

All ranking categories →

DATA NOTICE

allk12 is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCES, the US Census Bureau, any state education agency or assessment program, or any other government agency. Source data is compiled from public records and provided "as is," without warranty of accuracy or completeness. You rely on it, and any analysis derived from it, at your own risk. See the full disclaimer.