allk12 · Rankings · Lowest poverty · Oklahoma · Middle schools

The lowest-poverty (most affluent) public middle schools in Oklahoma

Across Oklahoma, 308 public middle schools are ranked here, ranked by the smallest share of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. WEST INTERMEDIATE leads the list at 16.9%, against a median of 67.3% across the ranked schools.

The table below is sortable and filterable, and the full list downloads as a CSV. Figures come from federal NCES enrollment data and, where applicable, state assessment results for 2024-25.

Schools ranked

308

Oklahoma

Best % FRL

16.9%

Median % FRL

67.3%

LOWEST POVERTY · OKLAHOMA

#	School	City	District	Level	Students	% FRL
1	WEST INTERMEDIATE	Bixby, OK	BIXBY	Middle	533	16.9%
2	CENTRAL MS	Edmond, OK	EDMOND	Middle	1,036	20.1%
3	PIEDMONT MS	Piedmont, OK	PIEDMONT	Middle	796	24.5%
4	NORTH INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL	Bixby, OK	BIXBY	Middle	487	24.8%
5	DEER CREEK MS	Edmond, OK	DEER CREEK	Middle	1,257	25.2%
6	PIEDMONT INTERMEDIATE ES	Piedmont, OK	PIEDMONT	Middle	839	25.4%
7	CASHION MS	Cashion, OK	CASHION	Middle	206	26.2%
8	OKARCHE JHS	Okarche, OK	OKARCHE	Middle	112	26.8%
9	DEER CREEK INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL	Edmond, OK	DEER CREEK	Middle	639	27.1%
10	WASHINGTON MS	Washington, OK	WASHINGTON	Middle	277	27.1%
11	ELGIN MS	Elgin, OK	ELGIN	Middle	799	27.9%
12	CARL ALBERT MS	Oklahoma City, OK	MIDWEST CITY-DEL CITY	Middle	834	28.5%
13	BIXBY MS	Bixby, OK	BIXBY	Middle	1,306	29.7%
14	CHEYENNE MS	Edmond, OK	EDMOND	Middle	821	29.8%
15	SOUTHRIDGE JHS	Oklahoma City, OK	MOORE	Middle	562	31.5%
16	BRINK JHS	Oklahoma City, OK	MOORE	Middle	668	31.7%
17	SEQUOYAH MS	Edmond, OK	EDMOND	Middle	1,053	31.8%
18	MINCO MS	Minco, OK	MINCO	Middle	135	31.9%
19	TUTTLE MS	Tuttle, OK	TUTTLE	Middle	438	32.4%
20	VERDIGRIS JHS	Claremore, OK	VERDIGRIS	Middle	215	33.0%
21	VERDIGRIS UPPER ES	Claremore, OK	VERDIGRIS	Middle	314	33.1%
22	NEWCASTLE MS	Newcastle, OK	NEWCASTLE	Middle	599	33.6%
23	CHISHOLM MS	Enid, OK	CHISHOLM	Middle	247	34.0%
24	BETHANY MS	Bethany, OK	BETHANY	Middle	381	34.4%
25	EAST INTERMEDIATE	Broken Arrow, OK	BIXBY	Middle	462	35.3%
26	CHOCTAW MS	Choctaw, OK	CHOCTAW-NICOMA PARK	Middle	687	36.5%
27	BLANCHARD MS	Blanchard, OK	BLANCHARD	Middle	454	37.7%
28	CRESCENT MS	Crescent, OK	CRESCENT	Middle	113	38.9%
29	WHITTIER MS	Norman, OK	NORMAN	Middle	1,108	39.4%
30	OWASSO 8TH GRADE CTR	Owasso, OK	OWASSO	Middle	782	39.6%
31	JENKS EAST INTERMEDIATE ES	Tulsa, OK	JENKS	Middle	815	39.8%
32	HEARTLAND MS	Edmond, OK	EDMOND	Middle	1,005	40.4%
33	ONETA RIDGE MS	Broken Arrow, OK	BROKEN ARROW	Middle	938	40.7%
34	CENTRAL HIGH MS	MARLOW, OK	CENTRAL HIGH	Middle	103	40.8%
35	CENTRAL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL	Bixby, OK	BIXBY	Middle	451	41.0%
36	LINDSAY MS	Lindsay, OK	LINDSAY	Middle	313	41.2%
37	BERRYHILL MS	Tulsa, OK	BERRYHILL	Middle	152	41.4%
38	CIMARRON MS	Edmond, OK	EDMOND	Middle	833	41.7%
39	HIGHLAND EAST JHS	Moore, OK	MOORE	Middle	751	41.9%
40	CACHE MS	Cache, OK	CACHE	Middle	620	42.4%
41	CLASSEN MS OF ADVANCED STUDIES	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	Middle	916	42.5%
42	DALE MS	Dale, OK	DALE	Middle	218	42.7%
43	NICOMA PARK MS	Choctaw, OK	CHOCTAW-NICOMA PARK	Middle	652	42.8%
44	OWASSO 6TH GRADE CTR	Owasso, OK	OWASSO	Middle	713	43.1%
45	CENTENNIAL MS	Broken Arrow, OK	BROKEN ARROW	Middle	1,060	43.2%
46	NORTH ROCK CREEK MS	Shawnee, OK	NORTH ROCK CREEK	Middle	141	43.3%
47	MUSTANG NORTH MS	Yukon, OK	MUSTANG	Middle	725	43.3%
48	INOLA MS	Inola, OK	INOLA	Middle	391	43.5%
49	SEQUOYAH MS	Claremore, OK	SEQUOYAH	Middle	284	43.7%
50	BRIDGE CREEK MS	Blanchard, OK	BRIDGE CREEK	Middle	458	44.1%

Page 1 of 7 · top 308 of 308 ranked. NCES + state assessment data, 2024-25.↓ Download full CSV

All Oklahoma schools →

Lowest poverty rankings at a wider scope

Nationwide

Other rankings for Oklahoma

Largest Most diverse Lowest ratio Highest proficiency Fastest growing Highest poverty Highest ratio Fastest declining Lowest proficiency Most Hispanic Most Black Most White Most Asian

All ranking categories →

DATA NOTICE

allk12 is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCES, the US Census Bureau, any state education agency or assessment program, or any other government agency. Source data is compiled from public records and provided "as is," without warranty of accuracy or completeness. You rely on it, and any analysis derived from it, at your own risk. See the full disclaimer.