allk12 · Rankings · Most male · Oklahoma · Middle schools

The public middle schools with the highest share of male students in Oklahoma · page 2

Ranks 51–100 of the public schools with the highest share of male students in Oklahoma. Back to page 1.

MOST MALE · OKLAHOMA

#	School	City	District	Students	Male students	% Male
51	CHICKASHA MS	Chickasha, OK	CHICKASHA	288	157	54.5%
52	Nathan Hale Middle School	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	782	426	54.5%
53	APACHE MS	Apache, OK	BOONE-APACHE	112	61	54.5%
54	CHELSEA MS	Chelsea, OK	CHELSEA	191	104	54.5%
55	MOON MS	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	588	320	54.4%
56	CENTRAL JHS	Moore, OK	MOORE	574	312	54.4%
57	OWASSO 8TH GRADE CTR	Owasso, OK	OWASSO	782	425	54.4%
58	WHEELER MS	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	510	277	54.3%
59	NICOMA PARK MS	Choctaw, OK	CHOCTAW-NICOMA PARK	652	354	54.3%
60	MIAMI JR HS	Miami, OK	MIAMI	396	215	54.3%
61	STROUD MS	Stroud, OK	STROUD	177	96	54.2%
62	East Central Middle School	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	843	457	54.2%
63	BYNG ES	Ada, OK	BYNG	382	207	54.2%
64	PLAINVIEW MS	Ardmore, OK	PLAINVIEW	366	198	54.1%
65	Kingfisher Junior High School	Kingfisher, OK	KINGFISHER	213	115	54.0%
66	DEWAR MS	Dewar, OK	DEWAR	119	64	53.8%
67	STILLWATER MS	Stillwater, OK	STILLWATER	932	501	53.8%
68	MUSTANG HORIZON IES	Mustang, OK	MUSTANG	698	375	53.7%
69	ALTUS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL	Altus, OK	ALTUS	509	273	53.6%
70	TONKAWA MS	Tonkawa, OK	TONKAWA	194	104	53.6%
71	COLLINSVILLE MS	Collinsville, OK	COLLINSVILLE	478	256	53.6%
72	PIEDMONT INTERMEDIATE ES	Piedmont, OK	PIEDMONT	839	449	53.5%
73	WESTERN HEIGHTS MS	Oklahoma City, OK	WESTERN HEIGHTS	370	198	53.5%
74	MACARTHUR MS	Lawton, OK	LAWTON	829	443	53.4%
75	MONROE DEMONSTRATION MS	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	657	351	53.4%
76	MINCO MS	Minco, OK	MINCO	135	72	53.3%
77	SNYDER ES	Snyder, OK	SNYDER	165	88	53.3%
78	TULSA HONOR FLORES MS	Tulsa, OK	TULSA HONOR CHARTER ACADEMY	349	186	53.3%
79	BEGGS MS	Beggs, OK	BEGGS	289	154	53.3%
80	Rogers Middle School	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	518	276	53.3%
81	ONETA RIDGE MS	Broken Arrow, OK	BROKEN ARROW	938	499	53.2%
82	INOLA MS	Inola, OK	INOLA	391	208	53.2%
83	MARLOW MS	Marlow, OK	MARLOW	282	150	53.2%
84	DIBBLE MS	BLANCHARD, OK	DIBBLE	190	101	53.2%
85	JOHN MARSHALL MS	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	698	371	53.1%
86	WEBSTER MS	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	676	359	53.1%
87	HERITAGE INTERMEDIATE GRD CTR	Coweta, OK	COWETA	390	207	53.1%
88	BRIDGESTONE ES	Oklahoma City, OK	WESTERN HEIGHTS	407	216	53.1%
89	WEST JHS	Oklahoma City, OK	MOORE	605	321	53.1%
90	PERKINS-TRYON MS	PERKINS, OK	PERKINS-TRYON	330	175	53.0%
91	SULPHUR MS	Sulphur, OK	SULPHUR	310	164	52.9%
92	COLBERT MS	Colbert, OK	COLBERT	121	64	52.9%
93	CHOUTEAU-MAZIE MS	Chouteau, OK	CHOUTEAU-MAZIE	244	129	52.9%
94	HOBART MS	Hobart, OK	HOBART	140	74	52.9%
95	NICHOLS UPPER ES	Miami, OK	MIAMI	454	240	52.9%
96	SANTA FE SOUTH MS	Oklahoma City, OK	SANTA FE SOUTH CHARTER	738	390	52.9%
97	JAY MS	Jay, OK	JAY	229	121	52.8%
98	WILLARD ES	Ada, OK	ADA	373	197	52.8%
99	CHEYENNE MS	Edmond, OK	EDMOND	821	433	52.7%
100	HEARTLAND MS	Edmond, OK	EDMOND	1,005	530	52.7%

Page 2 of 7 · top 307 of 307 ranked. NCES + state assessment data, 2024-25.↓ Download full CSV

All Oklahoma schools →

Most male rankings at a wider scope

Nationwide

Other rankings for Oklahoma

Largest Most diverse Lowest ratio Highest proficiency Fastest growing Highest poverty Lowest poverty Highest ratio Fastest declining Lowest proficiency Most Hispanic Most Black Most White Most Asian Best in math Best in reading Best in science Most improved Biggest declines Most Native American Most Pacific Islander Most multiracial Most Hispanic (count)Most Black (count)Most White (count)Most Asian (count)Most Native American (count)Most Pacific Islander (count)Most multiracial (count)Smallest Most female Largest charters

All ranking categories →

DATA NOTICE

allk12 is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCES, the US Census Bureau, any state education agency or assessment program, or any other government agency. Source data is compiled from public records and provided "as is," without warranty of accuracy or completeness. You rely on it, and any analysis derived from it, at your own risk. See the full disclaimer.