The bulletin board for America's public schools. Parents, teachers, students, and staff. One community per school.
free and reduced lunchpovertystate dataschool meals

Free and reduced lunch by state

Arthur Chen
Former Professor of Education · Sep 28, 2026 · 12:20 PM ET
Free and reduced lunch by state
See more of our coverage in your search results.Add allk12 on Google

In 21 states, more than half of public school students qualify for a free or reduced-price lunch. That comes from allk12's analysis of federal school data for the 2024-25 school year, covering the 41 states where schools reported the number for at least 85% of their students.

Across those 41 states, 23,418,959 of 41,370,891 students were eligible, or 56.6%. New Mexico had the highest rate at 89.6%, and New Hampshire the lowest at 24%. In raw numbers, California and Texas dwarf everyone else, with about 3.56 million and 3.32 million eligible students.

Free and reduced lunch eligibility is a common stand-in for student poverty in school data. Students from families earning below 130% of the federal poverty level qualify for free lunch, and those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. Children in families that receive SNAP and some other benefits are certified automatically, without filling out a form. We explain more in our guide to what free and reduced lunch means for your child's school.

Every state with complete data

RankStateShare eligibleEligible students
1New Mexico89.6%257,120
2Nevada87.3%384,678
3North Carolina76.8%1,124,558
4Mississippi73.6%316,617
5Oregon72.3%364,233
6Georgia67.9%1,163,645
7Louisiana66.2%440,047
8Arkansas65.3%311,156
9Oklahoma63.6%422,451
10California63.1%3,559,178
11Pennsylvania62.6%991,870
12Texas61.7%3,317,029
13Virginia59.2%738,646
14Kentucky58.3%376,986
15New York57.1%1,415,890
16Illinois54.6%877,360
16Montana54.6%79,498
18Alabama54.3%397,297
19Rhode Island54.2%72,883
20Maryland51.3%457,308
21Kansas50.6%234,713
22Missouri49.4%430,711
22Michigan49.4%657,733
24Washington48.2%516,817
25Indiana47.4%477,517
26Vermont46.9%36,810
27Florida46.4%1,307,792
28Hawaii46.0%76,934
29Colorado45.8%375,944
30Maine45.3%75,305
31Connecticut44.5%218,433
32New Jersey43.3%582,322
33Wyoming42.8%36,560
34Idaho42.1%119,650
35Iowa41.6%205,771
36South Dakota41.2%60,148
37Wisconsin40.3%317,419
38Minnesota40.0%345,719
39North Dakota33.7%41,207
40Utah29.1%193,190
41New Hampshire24.0%39,814

Share of students in reporting public schools who were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 2024-25. Excludes virtual schools. Source: allk12 analysis of NCES Common Core of Data.

The top of the list mixes the South and the West. After New Mexico and Nevada come North Carolina, Mississippi, and Oregon, all above 70%. At the bottom, New Hampshire, Utah, and North Dakota are the only states under 35%, and four Upper Midwest states, Minnesota, Wisconsin, South Dakota, and Iowa, sit near 40%.

Why some states are missing

Nine states along with Washington D.C. are not in the table. Tennessee, Massachusetts, West Virginia, Delaware, and D.C. did not report free and reduced lunch counts for their schools. Arizona and South Carolina reported it for about 1% of students, Ohio for about 54%, Nebraska for 74%, and Alaska for 79%. A statewide rate built from insufficient data would not be reliable, so we left them out.

Some of the gap traces to a change in federal law. The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act required states to directly certify eligibility for at least 95% of SNAP participants. NCES says that "with the mandated use of direct certification, several states stopped reporting FRPL eligibility entirely."

The same law created the Community Eligibility Provision, which lets schools in low-income areas serve free meals to every student. That affects the numbers too. According to NCES, "CEP schools may report all students as eligible for free lunch regardless of economic status, since all students are provided a free lunch." A state with many community eligibility schools can therefore show a higher rate than its family incomes alone would produce. It is one reason this figure is best read as a rough measure of need, not an exact count of poor children. Some states now pay for free school meals for every student regardless of income.

School pages on allk12 show each school's free and reduced lunch share where the state reports it, and our report on free lunch rates and test scores looks at how the two line up in each state.

Sources
Free and reduced-price lunch counts and enrollment from allk12's analysis of National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Common Core of Data, 2024-25.
NCES: Understanding School Lunch Eligibility in the Common Core of Data
NCES Condition of Education: Concentration of Public School Students Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch

Frequently asked questions

Which state has the highest free and reduced lunch rate?
New Mexico, where 89.6% of students in reporting public schools were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch in 2024-25, according to allk12's analysis of federal data. Nevada was second at 87.3%, followed by North Carolina at 76.8% and Mississippi at 73.6%.
Who qualifies for free or reduced-price lunch?
Students from families with incomes below 130% of the federal poverty level qualify for free lunch, and those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch, according to NCES. Children in households receiving SNAP and certain other benefits can be directly certified without an application.
Why are some states missing from free and reduced lunch data?
Some states report free and reduced lunch counts for only part of their schools or none at all. NCES says several states stopped reporting the figure after federal law required them to directly certify students through benefit programs such as SNAP. This analysis includes only states that reported it for at least 85% of students.
LOADING COMMENTS…
WRITTEN BY
Arthur Chen
Arthur Chen
Former Professor of Education

Arthur Chen grew up in British Columbia and spent his academic career in university classrooms before turning his attention to K-12 education writing

EXPERTISE
Child development and early learningCross-cultural education systemsAcademic assessment