The lowest-performing public middle schools by test proficiency in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
This ranking covers the lowest-performing public middle schools by test proficiency in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, drawn from 22 qualifying public middle schools. Life Male STEAM Academy CS leads the list at 8.2%, against a median of 57.3% across the ranked schools.
Use the search box to find a specific school within this ranking, sort by any column, or export the full list. Built from NCES and state data for 2024-25.
| # | School | City | % Proficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Life Male STEAM Academy CS | Pittsburgh, PA | 8.2% |
| 2 | Pittsburgh South Hills 6-8 | Pittsburgh, PA | 15.4% |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Allegheny 6-8 | Pittsburgh, PA | 19.3% |
| 4 | Provident CS | Pittsburgh, PA | 20.0% |
| 5 | Linton MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 20.0% |
| 6 | Pittsburgh Sterrett 6-8 | Pittsburgh, PA | 26.2% |
| 7 | Pittsburgh Schiller 6-8 | Pittsburgh, PA | 36.7% |
| 8 | Brentwood MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 45.1% |
| 9 | Plum MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 47.8% |
| 10 | J.E. Harrison MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 51.3% |
| 11 | Keystone Oaks MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 56.8% |
| 12 | Holiday Park Intermediate Sch | Pittsburgh, PA | 57.8% |
| 13 | Avonworth MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 63.9% |
| 14 | Carson MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 64.3% |
| 15 | North Hills MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 64.7% |
| 16 | Pleasant Hills MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 66.7% |
| 17 | Ingomar MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 74.3% |
| 18 | Mellon MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 76.3% |
| 19 | Jefferson MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 76.6% |
| 20 | Fort Couch MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 79.9% |
| 21 | Dorseyville MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 80.4% |
| 22 | Boyce MS | Pittsburgh, PA | 84.5% |
Lowest proficiency rankings at a wider scope
Other rankings for Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
allk12 is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCES, the US Census Bureau, any state education agency or assessment program, or any other government agency. Source data is compiled from public records and provided "as is," without warranty of accuracy or completeness. You rely on it, and any analysis derived from it, at your own risk. See the full disclaimer.