allk12 · Rankings · Lowest proficiency · Mississippi · K-12 schools

The lowest-performing public K-12 schools by test proficiency in Mississippi

Across Mississippi, 28 public K-12 schools are ranked here, ranked by the lowest composite state-assessment proficiency. Taylorsville Attendance Center leads the list at 39.3%, against a median of 63.2% across the ranked schools.

Sort any column, filter to a school or district, or download the full ranking as a CSV. Source data is federal NCES and state assessment reporting, 2024-25.

Schools ranked

Mississippi

Best % Proficient

39.3%

Median % Proficient

63.2%

LOWEST PROFICIENCY · MISSISSIPPI

#	School	City	District	Level	% FRL	Students	% Proficient
1	Taylorsville Attendance Center	TAYLORSVILLE, MS	Smith County School District	Combined	88.6%	572	39.3%
2	Scott Central Attendance Center	FOREST, MS	Scott County School District	Combined	99.6%	856	50.0%
3	Mt. Olive Attendance Center	Mount Olive, MS	Covington County School District	Combined	98.9%	282	52.0%
4	Houlka Attendance Center	HOULKA, MS	Chickasaw County School District	Combined	72.9%	457	55.8%
5	Tremont Attendance Center	Tremont, MS	Itawamba County	Combined	71.8%	312	56.8%
6	Loyd Star Attendance Center	BROOKHAVEN, MS	Lincoln County School District	Combined	67.5%	741	57.3%
7	Mantachie Attendance Center	MANTACHIE, MS	Itawamba County	Combined	70.5%	926	58.1%
8	Noxapater Attendance	NOXAPATER, MS	Louisville Municipal School District	Combined	68.9%	473	58.4%
9	Thrasher High School	Booneville, MS	Prentiss County School District	Combined	76.5%	387	59.1%
10	Salem	Tylertown, MS	Walthall County School District	Combined	64.6%	469	60.4%
11	Jumpertown School	Booneville, MS	Prentiss County School District	Combined	86.6%	305	61.5%
12	Hatley School	AMORY, MS	Monroe County School District	Combined	58.2%	905	62.7%
13	Vardaman Attendance Center	Vardaman, MS	Calhoun County School District	Combined	74.7%	624	62.8%
14	Belmont Schools	Belmont, MS	Tishomingo County School District	Combined	65.4%	855	63.1%
15	Nanih Waiya Attendance Center	Louisville, MS	Louisville Municipal School District	Combined	59.6%	517	63.3%
16	Blue Mountain High School	Blue Mountain, MS	South Tippah School District	Combined	92.2%	295	65.1%
17	Bogue Chitto School	BOGUE CHITTO, MS	Lincoln County School District	Combined	68.1%	747	67.0%
18	Wheeler High School	Booneville, MS	Prentiss County School District	Combined	65.7%	577	67.5%
19	Enterprise Attendance Center	BROOKHAVEN, MS	Lincoln County School District	Combined	64.5%	667	67.8%
20	Pine Grove High School	Ripley, MS	South Tippah School District	Combined	73.1%	573	70.3%
21	Mize Attendance Center	MIZE, MS	Smith County School District	Combined	62.7%	831	71.0%
22	Wesson Attendance Center	Wesson, MS	Copiah County School District	Combined	100%	833	71.6%
23	Stringer Attendance Center	STRINGER, MS	West Jasper School District	Combined	69.4%	579	71.7%
24	Ingomar Attendance Center	NEW ALBANY, MS	Union County School District	Combined	50.0%	678	72.3%
25	Sebastopol Attendance Center	SEBASTOPOL, MS	Scott County School District	Combined	99.6%	684	72.4%
26	West Lincoln School	BROOKHAVEN, MS	Lincoln County School District	Combined	61.2%	636	74.0%
27	Smithville School	SMITHVILLE, MS	Monroe County School District	Combined	48.7%	540	74.5%
28	West Union Attendance Center	MYRTLE, MS	Union County School District	Combined	57.6%	660	81.4%

Page 1 of 1 · top 28 of 28 ranked. NCES + state assessment data, 2024-25.↓ Download full CSV

All Mississippi schools →

Lowest proficiency rankings at a wider scope

Nationwide

Other rankings for Mississippi

Largest Most diverse Lowest ratio Highest proficiency Fastest growing Highest poverty Lowest poverty Highest ratio Fastest declining Most Hispanic Most Black Most White Most Asian

All ranking categories →

DATA NOTICE

allk12 is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCES, the US Census Bureau, any state education agency or assessment program, or any other government agency. Source data is compiled from public records and provided "as is," without warranty of accuracy or completeness. You rely on it, and any analysis derived from it, at your own risk. See the full disclaimer.