allk12 · Rankings · Fastest declining · Oklahoma

The fastest-declining public schools by enrollment in Oklahoma

Across Oklahoma, 753 public schools are ranked here, ranked by the steepest enrollment decline between the 2017-18 and 2024-25 school years. MCLOUD ES leads the list at -80.0%, against a median of -12.2% across the ranked schools.

The table below is sortable and filterable, and the full list downloads as a CSV. Figures come from federal NCES enrollment data and, where applicable, state assessment results for 2024-25.

Schools ranked

753

Oklahoma

Best Enrollment change

-80.0%

Median Enrollment change

-12.2%

FASTEST DECLINING · OKLAHOMA

#	School	City	District	2017-18	2024-25	% Change
1	MCLOUD ES	McLoud, OK	MCLOUD	1,061	212	-80.0%
2	MUSTANG EDUCATION CTR	Mustang, OK	MUSTANG	286	117	-59.1%
3	MISSION ES	Anadarko, OK	ANADARKO	346	162	-53.2%
4	FOX ES	Fox, OK	FOX	215	107	-50.2%
5	TENKILLER PUBLIC SCHOOL	Welling, OK	TENKILLER	301	157	-47.8%
6	CRAIN ES	Clayton, OK	CLAYTON	221	116	-47.5%
7	WILSON ES	Seminole, OK	SEMINOLE	603	318	-47.3%
8	OLIVE ES	Drumright, OK	OLIVE	234	125	-46.6%
9	ARDMORE MS	Ardmore, OK	ARDMORE	572	312	-45.5%
10	BLAIR ES	Blair, OK	BLAIR	214	117	-45.3%
11	PRAGUE ES	Prague, OK	PRAGUE	508	278	-45.3%
12	SKIATOOK INTERMEDIATE ES	Skiatook, OK	SKIATOOK	561	320	-43.0%
13	HAMILTON ES	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	531	303	-42.9%
14	TISHOMINGO MS	Tishomingo, OK	TISHOMINGO	286	165	-42.3%
15	WASHINGTON ES	Lawton, OK	LAWTON	211	122	-42.2%
16	GLENPOOL ES	Glenpool, OK	GLENPOOL	1,436	840	-41.5%
17	ROBERTSON ES	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	386	228	-40.9%
18	JAY MS	Jay, OK	JAY	379	229	-39.6%
19	PLEASANT HILL EC CTR	Oklahoma City, OK	MIDWEST CITY-DEL CITY	210	127	-39.5%
20	PANSY KIDD MS	Poteau, OK	POTEAU	476	288	-39.5%
21	LIBERTY ES	Mounds, OK	LIBERTY	369	225	-39.0%
22	GILMOUR ES	Kingfisher, OK	KINGFISHER	415	254	-38.8%
23	BELL ES	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	541	332	-38.6%
24	KERR ES	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	566	349	-38.3%
25	PRAIRIE QUEEN ES	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	918	568	-38.1%
26	SILO ES	Durant, OK	SILO	495	311	-37.2%
27	EDISON ES	Mangum, OK	MANGUM	347	220	-36.6%
28	KIRKLAND EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR	Oklahoma City, OK	PUTNAM CITY	382	243	-36.4%
29	JOHN GLENN ES	Oklahoma City, OK	WESTERN HEIGHTS	624	398	-36.2%
30	ANGIE DEBO ES	Edmond, OK	EDMOND	952	609	-36.0%
31	HOOVER ES	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	463	297	-35.9%
32	POTEAU PRIMARY ES	Poteau, OK	POTEAU	684	439	-35.8%
33	CLARK ES	Tulsa, OK	UNION	696	448	-35.6%
34	BURCHAM ES	Weatherford, OK	WEATHERFORD	562	362	-35.6%
35	SEQUOYAH ES	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	608	392	-35.5%
36	ADAMS ES	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	581	378	-34.9%
37	BENNINGTON ES	Bennington, OK	BENNINGTON	251	164	-34.7%
38	WASHINGTON IRVING ES	Durant, OK	DURANT	668	436	-34.7%
39	DEER CREEK INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL	Edmond, OK	DEER CREEK	977	639	-34.6%
40	GUTHRIE UPPER ES	Guthrie, OK	GUTHRIE	811	534	-34.2%
41	EMERSON ALTERNATIVE ED. (HS)	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	805	530	-34.2%
42	HORACE MANN ES	Shawnee, OK	SHAWNEE	353	233	-34.0%
43	CESAR CHAVEZ ES	Oklahoma City, OK	OKLAHOMA CITY	846	559	-33.9%
44	BOSWELL ES	Boswell, OK	BOSWELL	226	150	-33.6%
45	WOODWARD EC CTR	Woodward, OK	WOODWARD	452	301	-33.4%
46	MUSKOGEE HS	Muskogee, OK	MUSKOGEE	1,561	1,045	-33.1%
47	THOREAU DEMONSTRATION ACADEMY	Tulsa, OK	TULSA	648	434	-33.0%
48	MAUD ES	Maud, OK	MAUD	222	150	-32.4%
49	PAWHUSKA ES	Pawhuska, OK	PAWHUSKA	231	157	-32.0%
50	GLENPOOL MS	Glenpool, OK	GLENPOOL	598	407	-31.9%

Page 1 of 16 · top 753 of 753 ranked. NCES + state assessment data, 2024-25.↓ Download full CSV

All Oklahoma schools →

Fastest declining rankings at a wider scope

Nationwide

Other rankings for Oklahoma

Largest Most diverse Lowest ratio Highest proficiency Fastest growing Highest poverty Lowest poverty Highest ratio Lowest proficiency Most Hispanic Most Black Most White Most Asian

All ranking categories →

DATA NOTICE

allk12 is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCES, the US Census Bureau, any state education agency or assessment program, or any other government agency. Source data is compiled from public records and provided "as is," without warranty of accuracy or completeness. You rely on it, and any analysis derived from it, at your own risk. See the full disclaimer.