The bulletin board for America's public schools. Parents, teachers, students, and staff. One community per school.
MATH vs READING · DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

District of Columbia: where math and reading scores diverge

District of Columbia public schools with the widest gap between math and reading proficiency. Same students, same test, only the subject changes.

Schools in this report
40
widest divergence in state
Most reading-ahead
-48 pp
McKinley Technology HS
Smallest reading lead
-14 pp
Washington Leadership Academy PCS
DC PUBLIC SCHOOLS · WIDEST MATH-READING DIVERGENCE
SchoolCityLevelMath %Reading %Math − Reading (pp)
McKinley Technology HSWashingtonHigh26.7%74.7%-48
Washington Latin PCS - Upper SchoolWashingtonHigh38.2%80.1%-41.9
Duke Ellington School of the ArtsWashingtonHigh16.0%56.9%-40.9
Jackson-Reed HSWashingtonHigh36.2%69.9%-33.7
Benjamin Banneker HSWashingtonHigh60.9%92.3%-31.4
Bard HS Early College DC (Bard DC)WashingtonHigh9.6%39.7%-30.1
Stuart-Hobson MS (Capitol Hill Cluster)WashingtonMiddle31.8%59.9%-28.1
Paul PCS - International HSWashingtonHigh7.0%33.8%-26.8
Capitol Hill Montessori School at LoganWashingtonElementary23.3%49.4%-26.1
Phelps Architecture Construction and Engineering HSWashingtonHigh11.6%37.4%-25.8
The Sojourner Truth School PCSWashingtonHigh24.6%50.0%-25.4
Digital Pioneers Academy PCS - Capitol HillWashingtonHigh11.1%34.6%-23.5
District of Columbia International SchoolWashingtonHigh33.8%56.8%-23
McKinley MSWashingtonMiddle7.6%30.2%-22.6
Paul PCS - MSWashingtonMiddle13.4%35.3%-21.9
Columbia Heights Education CampusWashingtonHigh11.2%33.0%-21.8
Friendship PCS - Technology Preparatory HSWashingtonHigh10.6%31.7%-21.1
Friendship PCS - Southeast MiddleWashingtonMiddle18.7%39.7%-21
MacArthur HSWashingtonHigh11.3%31.6%-20.3
Eastern HSWashingtonHigh5.0%25.2%-20.2
Brookland MSWashingtonMiddle8.4%28.3%-19.9
Ida B. Wells MSWashingtonMiddle16.5%36.1%-19.6
Washington Latin PCS - Anna Julia Cooper MSWashingtonMiddle49.6%69.1%-19.5
KIPP DC - College Preparatory PCSWashingtonHigh10.1%28.3%-18.2
Eliot-Hine MSWashingtonMiddle21.5%39.7%-18.2
Hardy MSWashingtonMiddle55.3%73.5%-18.2
Early Childhood Academy PCSWashingtonElementary27.5%45.0%-17.5
Friendship PCS - Ideal MiddleWashingtonMiddle20.5%37.8%-17.3
Friendship PCS - Chamberlain MiddleWashingtonMiddle19.6%35.7%-16.1
Washington Latin PCS - MSWashingtonMiddle58.4%74.5%-16.1
Breakthrough Montessori PCSWashingtonElementary13.3%29.2%-15.9
Howard University MS of Mathematics and Science PCSWashingtonMiddle14.5%30.4%-15.9
Friendship PCS - Woodridge International MiddleWashingtonMiddle28.6%44.5%-15.9
Friendship PCS - Collegiate AcademyWashingtonHigh8.3%24.1%-15.8
Elsie Whitlow Stokes Community Freedom PCS - BrooklandWashingtonElementary44.6%60.0%-15.4
Center City PCS - TrinidadWashingtonElementary11.4%26.7%-15.3
Meridian PCSWashingtonElementary7.5%22.6%-15.1
Two Rivers PCS - Young MSWashingtonMiddle10.4%25.4%-15
Coolidge HSWashingtonHigh8.1%22.9%-14.8
Washington Leadership Academy PCSWashingtonHigh10.0%24.2%-14.2
40 of 40 rows · Brick-and-mortar only; virtual schools and specialized-population schools excluded. Most recent year with both a math and a reading all-students result; schools must have 150+ students and at least 5% proficient in each subject (a floor that drops suppression/coding artifacts). A negative gap means students are more often proficient in reading than math.↓ Download math-reading-gap-by-state-dc.csv

How to read this list

Each school is scored on its most recent year carrying both a math and a reading (English Language Arts) all-students proficiency figure on District of Columbia's native assessment. The final column is the difference: math proficiency minus reading proficiency, in percentage points. A negative number means a school's students are more often proficient in reading than in math; a positive number means the reverse. Because both figures come from the same students taking the same test under the same cut-score policy, the gap is an apples-to-apples comparison in a way that raw cross-state proficiency rates are not.

A wide gap is not automatically a problem. Arts, language-immersion, and humanities-focused programs often post strong reading and weaker math; STEM and career-technical programs often do the reverse. But a persistent, schoolwide divergence is worth a parent's attention, because it can also flag a staffing gap, a curriculum weakness, or a math-anxiety culture that a single year of scores would hide.

What is excluded

Brick-and-mortar schools only: virtual academies and cyber charters are removed because their results are noisy and rarely reflect a school families choose geographically. Specialized-population schools (state schools for the deaf or blind, therapeutic and juvenile-justice placements, and NCES special-education or alternative-education campuses) are also excluded, because state proficiency rates are not a comparable metric for them. Schools must have at least 150 students and at least 5% proficient in each subject, a floor that drops suppression and coding artifacts.

Source data

District of Columbia state assessment results loaded into allk12, joined to the NCES Common Core of Data school directory. Refreshed when the state publishes a new assessment file. See the national report for the state-by-state summary.

HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT

Anyone is welcome to cite or republish these findings. Please credit allk12.com and link back to this page so readers can verify the underlying data.

allk12 (2026). "District of Columbia: the math vs reading proficiency gap by school." Retrieved from https://allk12.com/reports/math-reading-gap/district-of-columbia
For interview requests or custom data pulls: [email protected]
DOWNLOAD THE DATA
math-reading-gap-by-state-dc.csv
RELATED
Math vs reading gap by state · District of Columbia test scores · Best District of Columbia schools · All District of Columbia schools
DATA NOTICE

allk12 is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCES, the US Census Bureau, any state education agency or assessment program, or any other government agency. Source data is compiled from public records and provided "as is," without warranty of accuracy or completeness. You rely on it, and any analysis derived from it, at your own risk. See the full disclaimer.