The highest-performing public elementary schools in reading in Iowa · page 12
Ranks 551–564 of the highest-performing public schools in reading in Iowa. Back to page 1.
BEST IN READING · IOWA
| # | School | City | % Proficient (Reading) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 551 | Prescott Elementary School | Dubuque, IA | 40.6% |
| 552 | Lovejoy Elementary School | Des Moines, IA | 40.4% |
| 553 | Grant Elementary School | Cedar Rapids, IA | 39.9% |
| 554 | Garton Elementary | Des Moines, IA | 39.6% |
| 555 | Carver Elementary | Des Moines, IA | 39.2% |
| 556 | Monroe Elementary School | Des Moines, IA | 39.0% |
| 557 | Park Ave Elementary School | Des Moines, IA | 39.0% |
| 558 | Cunningham School | Waterloo, IA | 36.5% |
| 559 | King Elementary School | Des Moines, IA | 36.1% |
| 560 | Johnson STEAM Academy School | Cedar Rapids, IA | 35.9% |
| 561 | Edmunds Elementary School | Des Moines, IA | 34.5% |
| 562 | Cedar River Academy at Taylor | Cedar Rapids, IA | 31.9% |
| 563 | Jefferson Elementary School | Davenport, IA | 23.0% |
| 564 | Madison Elementary School | Davenport, IA | 22.7% |
Page 12 of 12 · top 564 of 564 ranked. NCES + state assessment data, 2024-25.↓ Download full CSV
Best in reading rankings at a wider scope
Other rankings for Iowa
LargestMost diverseLowest ratioHighest proficiencyFastest growingHighest povertyLowest povertyHighest ratioFastest decliningLowest proficiencyMost HispanicMost BlackMost WhiteMost AsianBest in mathBest in scienceMost improvedBiggest declinesMost Native AmericanMost Pacific IslanderMost multiracialMost Hispanic (count)Most Black (count)Most White (count)Most Asian (count)Most Native American (count)Most Pacific Islander (count)Most multiracial (count)SmallestMost maleMost femaleLargest charters
DATA NOTICE
allk12 is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCES, the US Census Bureau, any state education agency or assessment program, or any other government agency. Source data is compiled from public records and provided "as is," without warranty of accuracy or completeness. You rely on it, and any analysis derived from it, at your own risk. See the full disclaimer.