Texas schools ranked by test score
| Rank | School | Level | Social Studies | vs state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | LUMBERTON H S LUMBERTON · LUMBERTON ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 352 | MADISON H S SAN ANTONIO · NORTH EAST ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 353 | MIDLOTHIAN HERITAGE H S MIDLOTHIAN · MIDLOTHIAN ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 354 | OLNEY H S OLNEY · OLNEY ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 355 | PEARCE H S RICHARDSON · RICHARDSON ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 356 | PORT NECHES-GROVES H S PORT NECHES · PORT NECHES-GROVES ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 357 | PRAIRILAND H S PATTONVILLE · PRAIRILAND ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 358 | RICE H S RICE · RICE ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 359 | SHADOW CREEK H S PEARLAND · ALVIN ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 360 | SKIDMORE-TYNAN H S SKIDMORE · SKIDMORE-TYNAN ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 361 | TALKINGTON SCHOOL FOR YOUNG WOMEN LEADERS LUBBOCK · LUBBOCK ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 362 | TASCOSA H S AMARILLO · AMARILLO ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 363 | THRALL H S THRALL · THRALL ISD | High | 79.0% | +32.5pp |
| 364 | ACADEMY H S LITTLE RIVER · ACADEMY ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 365 | BURLESON H S BURLESON · BURLESON ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 366 | CELINA H S CELINA · CELINA ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 367 | CENTRAL HEIGHTS H S NACOGDOCHES · CENTRAL HEIGHTS ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 368 | CHISUM H S PARIS · CHISUM ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 369 | CLARENDON H S CLARENDON · CLARENDON ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 370 | DEVINE H S DEVINE · DEVINE ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 371 | DUMAS H S DUMAS · DUMAS ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 372 | EDGEWOOD H S EDGEWOOD · EDGEWOOD ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 373 | FORNEY H S FORNEY · FORNEY ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 374 | GEORGE H W BUSH NEW TECH ODESSA ODESSA · ECTOR COUNTY ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 375 | HARLINGEN SCHOOL OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS HARLINGEN · HARLINGEN CISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 376 | HARPER H S HARPER · HARPER ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 377 | HONEY GROVE H S HONEY GROVE · HONEY GROVE ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 378 | KLEIN H S KLEIN · KLEIN ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 379 | LAKE BELTON H S TEMPLE · BELTON ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 380 | LUBBOCK H S LUBBOCK · LUBBOCK ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 381 | MASON H S MASON · MASON ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 382 | PALMER H S PALMER · PALMER ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 383 | PANHANDLE H S PANHANDLE · PANHANDLE ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 384 | PILOT POINT H S PILOT POINT · PILOT POINT ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 385 | ROUND TOP-CARMINE H S CARMINE · ROUND TOP-CARMINE ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 386 | SCURRY-ROSSER H S SCURRY · SCURRY-ROSSER ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 387 | SOUTH TEXAS ISD HEALTH PROFESSIONS MERCEDES · SOUTH TEXAS ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 388 | VAN ALSTYNE H S VAN ALSTYNE · VAN ALSTYNE ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 389 | WARREN H S SAN ANTONIO · NORTHSIDE ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 390 | WEST PLAINS H S AMARILLO · CANYON ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 391 | WOODROW WILSON H S DALLAS · DALLAS ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 392 | YOAKUM H S YOAKUM · YOAKUM ISD | High | 78.0% | +31.5pp |
| 393 | AXTELL H S AXTELL · AXTELL ISD | High | 77.0% | +30.5pp |
| 394 | BELLAIRE H S BELLAIRE · HOUSTON ISD | High | 77.0% | +30.5pp |
| 395 | BIRDVILLE H S NORTH RICHLAND HILLS · BIRDVILLE ISD | High | 77.0% | +30.5pp |
| 396 | BOYD H S BOYD · BOYD ISD | High | 77.0% | +30.5pp |
| 397 | COLUMBUS H S COLUMBUS · COLUMBUS ISD | High | 77.0% | +30.5pp |
| 398 | DEER PARK H S DEER PARK · DEER PARK ISD | High | 77.0% | +30.5pp |
| 399 | EASTLAND H S EASTLAND · EASTLAND ISD | High | 77.0% | +30.5pp |
| 400 | FARMERSVILLE H S FARMERSVILLE · FARMERSVILLE ISD | High | 77.0% | +30.5pp |
About this ranking
Schools are ranked by the percentage of students who scored at or above the STAAR % Meets Grade Level or Above threshold on the latest available STAAR Social Studies test (school year 2023-24). A higher percentage is better.
Only public schools with a reasonable cohort size are included (at least 50 total students enrolled, since the source file does not include per-subject student counts), so very small programs and special-purpose centers are filtered out.
The state average shown above is enrollment-weighted: we multiply each school's score by how many of its students tested, sum those across every public school in Texas, and divide by the total students tested. This way a big school counts more than a tiny one in the typical-student average.