Oklahoma schools ranked by test score
| Rank | School | Level | Science | vs state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHISHOLM MS Enid · CHISHOLM | Middle | 74.0% | +34.6pp |
| 2 | BETHANY MS Bethany · BETHANY | Middle | 73.0% | +33.6pp |
| 3 | CENTRAL MS Edmond · EDMOND | Middle | 65.0% | +25.6pp |
| 4 | CLASSEN MS OF ADVANCED STUDIES Oklahoma City · OKLAHOMA CITY | Middle | 64.7% | +25.3pp |
| 5 | VERDIGRIS UPPER ES Claremore · VERDIGRIS | Middle | 64.0% | +24.6pp |
| 6 | FORT GIBSON MS Fort Gibson · FORT GIBSON | Middle | 61.0% | +21.6pp |
| 7 | GORE UPPER ES Gore · GORE | Middle | 61.0% | +21.6pp |
| 8 | WRIGHT CITY JHS Wright City · WRIGHT CITY | Middle | 61.0% | +21.6pp |
| 9 | LITTLE AXE MS Norman · LITTLE AXE | Middle | 60.0% | +20.6pp |
| 10 | BRINK JHS Oklahoma City · MOORE | Middle | 59.0% | +19.6pp |
| 11 | DEER CREEK MS Edmond · DEER CREEK | Middle | 59.0% | +19.6pp |
| 12 | CHEYENNE MS Edmond · EDMOND | Middle | 58.0% | +18.6pp |
| 13 | PIEDMONT MS Piedmont · PIEDMONT | Middle | 58.0% | +18.6pp |
| 14 | THOMAS-FAY-CUSTER UNIFIED JHS Thomas · THOMAS-FAY-CUSTER UNIFIED DIST | Middle | 58.0% | +18.6pp |
| 15 | CHANDLER JHS Chandler · CHANDLER | Middle | 57.0% | +17.6pp |
| 16 | SEQUOYAH MS Edmond · EDMOND | Middle | 56.0% | +16.6pp |
| 17 | MINCO MS Minco · MINCO | Middle | 55.0% | +15.6pp |
| 18 | EUFAULA MS Eufaula · EUFAULA | Middle | 54.0% | +14.6pp |
| 19 | HEARTLAND MS Edmond · EDMOND | Middle | 53.0% | +13.6pp |
| 20 | MEADOW BROOK INTERMEDIATE ES Yukon · MUSTANG | Middle | 53.0% | +13.6pp |
| 21 | MUSTANG MS Mustang · MUSTANG | Middle | 53.0% | +13.6pp |
| 22 | SOUTHRIDGE JHS Oklahoma City · MOORE | Middle | 53.0% | +13.6pp |
| 23 | WASHINGTON MS Washington · WASHINGTON | Middle | 53.0% | +13.6pp |
| 24 | BLANCHARD MS Blanchard · BLANCHARD | Middle | 52.0% | +12.6pp |
| 25 | CARVER MS Tulsa · TULSA | Middle | 52.0% | +12.6pp |
| 26 | MUSTANG NORTH MS Yukon · MUSTANG | Middle | 52.0% | +12.6pp |
| 27 | PLAINVIEW MS Ardmore · PLAINVIEW | Middle | 52.0% | +12.6pp |
| 28 | WARD ES EAST Colbert · COLBERT | Middle | 52.0% | +12.6pp |
| 29 | DOVE SCIENCE ACADEMY MS-SOUTH OKC OKlahoma City · DOVE SCHOOLS OF OKC (CHARTER) | Middle | 51.0% | +11.6pp |
| 30 | CIMARRON MS Edmond · EDMOND | Middle | 50.0% | +10.6pp |
| 31 | ELK CITY MS Elk City · ELK CITY | Middle | 50.0% | +10.6pp |
| 32 | JENKS MS Jenks · JENKS | Middle | 50.0% | +10.6pp |
| 33 | NICOMA PARK MS Choctaw · CHOCTAW-NICOMA PARK | Middle | 50.0% | +10.6pp |
| 34 | NORTH INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Bixby · BIXBY | Middle | 50.0% | +10.6pp |
| 35 | POCOLA MS Pocola · POCOLA | Middle | 50.0% | +10.6pp |
| 36 | RECTOR JOHNSON MS Broken Bow · BROKEN BOW | Middle | 50.0% | +10.6pp |
| 37 | TAHLEQUAH MS Tahlequah · TAHLEQUAH | Middle | 50.0% | +10.6pp |
| 38 | VERDIGRIS JHS Claremore · VERDIGRIS | Middle | 50.0% | +10.6pp |
| 39 | CHOUTEAU-MAZIE MS Chouteau · CHOUTEAU-MAZIE | Middle | 49.7% | +10.3pp |
| 40 | CANYON RIDGE IES Oklahoma City · MUSTANG | Middle | 49.0% | +9.6pp |
| 41 | PURCELL JHS Purcell · PURCELL | Middle | 49.0% | +9.6pp |
| 42 | WATONGA MS Watonga · WATONGA | Middle | 49.0% | +9.6pp |
| 43 | CACHE MS Cache · CACHE | Middle | 48.1% | +8.7pp |
| 44 | CHECOTAH MS Checotah · CHECOTAH | Middle | 48.0% | +8.6pp |
| 45 | MANGUM MS Mangum · MANGUM | Middle | 48.0% | +8.6pp |
| 46 | PARKER INTERMEDIATE CTR McAlester · MCALESTER | Middle | 48.0% | +8.6pp |
| 47 | WALTERS MS Walters · WALTERS | Middle | 48.0% | +8.6pp |
| 48 | MCLISH MS Stonewall · STONEWALL | Middle | 47.1% | +7.7pp |
| 49 | CHOCTAW MS Choctaw · CHOCTAW-NICOMA PARK | Middle | 47.0% | +7.6pp |
| 50 | ELK CITY IES Elk City · ELK CITY | Middle | 47.0% | +7.6pp |
About this ranking
Schools are ranked by the percentage of students who scored at or above the OSTP / CCRA % Proficient + Advanced threshold on the latest available OSTP / CCRA Science test (school year 2024-25). A higher percentage is better.
Only public schools with a reasonable cohort size are included (at least 50 total students enrolled, since the source file does not include per-subject student counts), so very small programs and special-purpose centers are filtered out.
The state average shown above is enrollment-weighted: we multiply each school's score by how many of its students tested, sum those across every public school in Oklahoma, and divide by the total students tested. This way a big school counts more than a tiny one in the typical-student average.