Oklahoma schools ranked by test score
| Rank | School | Level | English Language Arts | vs state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | AMBER-POCASSET MS Amber · AMBER-POCASSET | Middle | 32.5% | +1.9pp |
| 52 | HIGHLAND EAST JHS Moore · MOORE | Middle | 32.5% | +1.9pp |
| 53 | MUSTANG MS Mustang · MUSTANG | Middle | 32.5% | +1.9pp |
| 54 | CHECOTAH MS Checotah · CHECOTAH | Middle | 32.4% | +1.8pp |
| 55 | PLAINVIEW MS Ardmore · PLAINVIEW | Middle | 32.2% | +1.6pp |
| 56 | HOBART MS Hobart · HOBART | Middle | 32.0% | +1.4pp |
| 57 | OWASSO 7TH GRADE CTR Owasso · OWASSO | Middle | 32.0% | +1.4pp |
| 58 | Pauls Valley Intermediate School Pauls Valley · PAULS VALLEY | Middle | 32.0% | +1.4pp |
| 59 | SILO MS Durant · SILO | Middle | 32.0% | +1.4pp |
| 60 | WILSON 6TH GRADE CENTER Collinsville · COLLINSVILLE | Middle | 32.0% | +1.4pp |
| 61 | CACHE MS Cache · CACHE | Middle | 31.6% | +1.0pp |
| 62 | MANNFORD MS Mannford · MANNFORD | Middle | 31.0% | +0.4pp |
| 63 | PANSY KIDD MS Poteau · POTEAU | Middle | 31.0% | +0.4pp |
| 64 | THACKERVILLE MS Thackerville · THACKERVILLE | Middle | 30.8% | +0.2pp |
| 65 | ELK CITY MS Elk City · ELK CITY | Middle | 30.4% | -0.2pp |
| 66 | THOMAS-FAY-CUSTER UNIFIED JHS Thomas · THOMAS-FAY-CUSTER UNIFIED DIST | Middle | 30.1% | -0.5pp |
| 67 | CORDELL JHS Cordell · CORDELL | Middle | 30.0% | -0.6pp |
| 68 | HEARTLAND MS Edmond · EDMOND | Middle | 30.0% | -0.6pp |
| 69 | MUSTANG CENTRAL MS Yukon · MUSTANG | Middle | 30.0% | -0.6pp |
| 70 | MUSTANG HORIZON IES Mustang · MUSTANG | Middle | 30.0% | -0.6pp |
| 71 | NICOMA PARK MS Choctaw · CHOCTAW-NICOMA PARK | Middle | 30.0% | -0.6pp |
| 72 | TISHOMINGO MS Tishomingo · TISHOMINGO | Middle | 30.0% | -0.6pp |
| 73 | VERDIGRIS JHS Claremore · VERDIGRIS | Middle | 30.0% | -0.6pp |
| 74 | ELGIN MS Elgin · ELGIN | Middle | 29.9% | -0.7pp |
| 75 | HILLDALE MS Muskogee · HILLDALE | Middle | 29.7% | -0.9pp |
| 76 | VALLIANT MS Valliant · VALLIANT | Middle | 29.7% | -0.9pp |
| 77 | JENKS MS Jenks · JENKS | Middle | 29.5% | -1.1pp |
| 78 | LATTA MS Ada · LATTA | Middle | 29.5% | -1.1pp |
| 79 | SUMMIT MS Edmond · EDMOND | Middle | 29.3% | -1.3pp |
| 80 | BYNG JHS Ada · BYNG | Middle | 29.0% | -1.6pp |
| 81 | EMPIRE MS Duncan · EMPIRE | Middle | 29.0% | -1.6pp |
| 82 | GORE UPPER ES Gore · GORE | Middle | 29.0% | -1.6pp |
| 83 | HOLLIS MS Hollis · HOLLIS | Middle | 29.0% | -1.6pp |
| 84 | LUTHER MS Luther · LUTHER | Middle | 29.0% | -1.6pp |
| 85 | DURANT INTERMEDIATE ES Durant · DURANT | Middle | 28.9% | -1.7pp |
| 86 | Kingfisher Junior High School Kingfisher · KINGFISHER | Middle | 28.9% | -1.7pp |
| 87 | PRAGUE MS Prague · PRAGUE | Middle | 28.8% | -1.8pp |
| 88 | SANTA FE SOUTH MS Oklahoma City · SANTA FE SOUTH CHARTER | Middle | 28.7% | -1.9pp |
| 89 | East Intermediate School Weatherford · WEATHERFORD | Middle | 28.5% | -2.1pp |
| 90 | FREDERICK MS Frederick · FREDERICK | Middle | 28.5% | -2.1pp |
| 91 | LAKEVIEW INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Yukon · YUKON | Middle | 28.5% | -2.1pp |
| 92 | YUKON MS Yukon · YUKON | Middle | 28.5% | -2.1pp |
| 93 | MARLOW MS Marlow · MARLOW | Middle | 28.4% | -2.2pp |
| 94 | TAHLEQUAH MS Tahlequah · TAHLEQUAH | Middle | 28.3% | -2.3pp |
| 95 | MISSION INTERMEDIATE GRD CTR Coweta · COWETA | Middle | 28.2% | -2.4pp |
| 96 | CHANDLER JHS Chandler · CHANDLER | Middle | 28.0% | -2.6pp |
| 97 | CURTIS INGE MS Noble · NOBLE | Middle | 28.0% | -2.6pp |
| 98 | GLENPOOL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Glenpool · GLENPOOL | Middle | 28.0% | -2.6pp |
| 99 | HENNESSEY UPPER ES Hennessey · HENNESSEY | Middle | 28.0% | -2.6pp |
| 100 | PERRY JHS Perry · PERRY | Middle | 28.0% | -2.6pp |
About this ranking
Schools are ranked by the percentage of students who scored at or above the OSTP / CCRA % Proficient + Advanced threshold on the latest available OSTP / CCRA English Language Arts test (school year 2024-25). A higher percentage is better.
Only public schools with a reasonable cohort size are included (at least 50 total students enrolled, since the source file does not include per-subject student counts), so very small programs and special-purpose centers are filtered out.
The state average shown above is enrollment-weighted: we multiply each school's score by how many of its students tested, sum those across every public school in Oklahoma, and divide by the total students tested. This way a big school counts more than a tiny one in the typical-student average.