The bulletin board for America's public schools. Parents, teachers, students, and staff. One community per school.
MATH vs READING · NEVADA

Nevada: where math and reading scores diverge

Nevada public schools with the widest gap between math and reading proficiency. Same students, same test, only the subject changes.

Schools in this report
40
widest divergence in state
Most reading-ahead
-36 pp
Mackey Jo Middle School
Smallest reading lead
-17 pp
Legacy Traditional School North Valley
NV PUBLIC SCHOOLS · WIDEST MATH-READING DIVERGENCE
SchoolCityLevelMath %Reading %Math − Reading (pp) ↑
Mackey Jo Middle SchoolNORTH LAS VEGASMiddle32.7%68.9%-36.2
Explore Knowledge Academy J-SHSLas VegasHigh34.8%70.2%-35.4
High Desert MontessoriRENOElementary17.1%44.8%-27.7
Schofield Jack Lund Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle20.6%44.9%-24.3
Odyssey Charter Schools 6-8 Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle32.6%56.6%-24
Knudson K O Academy of the ArtsLas VegasMiddle17.5%41.4%-23.9
Innovations Int'l Charter J-SHSLas VegasHigh10.8%34.6%-23.8
Escobedo Edmundo Eddie Sr Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle20.3%44.1%-23.8
Becker Ernest Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle25.3%48.3%-23
Fremont John C Professional Dev Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle25.3%48.3%-23
Coral Academy Middle SchoolRENOMiddle39.0%61.9%-22.9
Explore Knowledge Academy Elementary SchoolLas VegasElementary37.0%59.6%-22.6
White Thurman Academy of the Arts Middle SchoolHendersonMiddle45.8%68.3%-22.5
Coral Academy CadenceHendersonCombined40.8%63.2%-22.4
Burkholder Lyal Academy of Environmental ScienceHendersonMiddle28.8%51.0%-22.2
Brown B Mahlon Junior High SchoolHendersonMiddle20.1%40.2%-20.1
Gibson Robert O MS Leadership AcademyLas VegasMiddle17.4%37.4%-20
Honors Academy of LiteratureRenoElementary30.1%50.0%-19.9
Silvestri Charles Junior High SchoolLas VegasMiddle18.6%38.5%-19.9
Coral Academy Sandy RidgeHendersonHigh58.3%78.1%-19.8
Lawrence Clifford J Junior High SchoolLas VegasMiddle21.9%40.9%-19
Quest Academy NorthwestLas VegasElementary26.2%45.2%-19
Democracy Prep at Agassi Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle18.9%37.8%-18.9
Leavitt Justice Myron E Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle29.2%47.9%-18.7
Johnson Walter JHS Academy of Int'l StudiesLas VegasMiddle33.0%51.6%-18.6
Robison Dell H Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle7.3%25.8%-18.5
Woodbury C W Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle8.5%26.9%-18.4
Sawyer Grant Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle22.4%40.7%-18.3
Carson MontessoriCarson CityElementary32.3%50.3%-18
Odyssey Charter Schools K-5 Elementary SchoolLas VegasElementary45.5%63.5%-18
Garside Frank F Junior High SchoolLas VegasMiddle10.4%28.4%-18
The Delta Academy J-SHSNorth Las VegasHigh17.2%35.2%-18
Tarkanian Lois & Jerry Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle43.9%61.9%-18
Mannion Jack & Terry Middle SchoolHendersonMiddle46.8%64.4%-17.6
Lou Mendive Middle SchoolSPARKSMiddle28.5%45.5%-17
Findlay Clifford O Middle SchoolN Las VegasMiddle7.5%24.4%-16.9
Mariposa Language and Learning AcademyRENOElementary23.3%40.1%-16.8
Rosemary Clarke Middle SchoolPahrumpMiddle19.1%35.9%-16.8
Cashman James Middle SchoolLas VegasMiddle15.6%32.3%-16.7
Legacy Traditional School North ValleyNorth Las VegasElementary32.6%49.3%-16.7
40 of 40 rows · Brick-and-mortar only; virtual schools and specialized-population schools excluded. Most recent year with both a math and a reading all-students result; schools must have 150+ students and at least 5% proficient in each subject (a floor that drops suppression/coding artifacts). A negative gap means students are more often proficient in reading than math.↓ Download math-reading-gap-by-state-nv.csv

How to read this list

Each school is scored on its most recent year carrying both a math and a reading (English Language Arts) all-students proficiency figure on Nevada's native assessment. The final column is the difference: math proficiency minus reading proficiency, in percentage points. A negative number means a school's students are more often proficient in reading than in math; a positive number means the reverse. Because both figures come from the same students taking the same test under the same cut-score policy, the gap is an apples-to-apples comparison in a way that raw cross-state proficiency rates are not.

A wide gap is not automatically a problem. Arts, language-immersion, and humanities-focused programs often post strong reading and weaker math; STEM and career-technical programs often do the reverse. But a persistent, schoolwide divergence is worth a parent's attention, because it can also flag a staffing gap, a curriculum weakness, or a math-anxiety culture that a single year of scores would hide.

What is excluded

Brick-and-mortar schools only: virtual academies and cyber charters are removed because their results are noisy and rarely reflect a school families choose geographically. Specialized-population schools (state schools for the deaf or blind, therapeutic and juvenile-justice placements, and NCES special-education or alternative-education schools) are also excluded, because state proficiency rates are not a comparable metric for them. Schools must have at least 150 students and at least 5% proficient in each subject, a floor that drops suppression and coding artifacts.

Source data

Nevada state assessment results loaded into allk12, joined to the NCES Common Core of Data school directory. Refreshed when the state publishes a new assessment file. See the national report for the state-by-state summary.

HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT

Anyone is welcome to cite or republish these findings. Please credit allk12.com and link back to this page so readers can verify the underlying data.

allk12 (2026). "Nevada: the math vs reading proficiency gap by school." Retrieved from https://allk12.com/reports/math-reading-gap/nevada
For interview requests or custom data pulls: [email protected]
DOWNLOAD THE DATA
↓ math-reading-gap-by-state-nv.csv
RELATED
Math vs reading gap by state · Nevada test scores · Best Nevada schools · All Nevada schools
DATA NOTICE

allk12 is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCES, the US Census Bureau, any state education agency or assessment program, or any other government agency. Source data is compiled from public records and provided "as is," without warranty of accuracy or completeness. You rely on it, and any analysis derived from it, at your own risk. See the full disclaimer.